Again, it didn’t bring any results
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 10:27 am
When did this happen? Probably, in 2010 or 2011... But you did not attach much importance to this beginning of the decline. You decided: it was all because of the guy, he began to slack off, got lazy. Well, you decided to be patient a little longer – maybe he’ll improve… Do you remember how he asked you to increase your link budget for the second time in a quarter – you agreed, but it didn’t bring any results.
Once again, damn it, it didn’t bring any results! How much longer can this go laos customer email list on? No, the guy has definitely gotten lazy, it’s time to replace him. You lost your patience – and found another optimizer. And again — the same picture. It seems that the new optimizer assures that he does everything in his power: he spends 80% of the budget on links, he has a copywriter on hand (I found him on a freelance basis, from Ukraine, he writes for food: economical!), he enters keywords very well: he manages to enter many keywords into the text — it doesn’t matter that the articles are about nothing and for no one, but how naturally the keywords are entered! But there is no result.
You go to the third, then to the fourth, and now you are about to look for the fifth. And you are already thinking: that first guy (who showed results at the end of the 2000s) was smart after all. You were lucky with him, it turns out, very lucky, oh, he got lazy for some reason. You need to look for someone just as smart, but not lazy.
Once again, damn it, it didn’t bring any results! How much longer can this go laos customer email list on? No, the guy has definitely gotten lazy, it’s time to replace him. You lost your patience – and found another optimizer. And again — the same picture. It seems that the new optimizer assures that he does everything in his power: he spends 80% of the budget on links, he has a copywriter on hand (I found him on a freelance basis, from Ukraine, he writes for food: economical!), he enters keywords very well: he manages to enter many keywords into the text — it doesn’t matter that the articles are about nothing and for no one, but how naturally the keywords are entered! But there is no result.
You go to the third, then to the fourth, and now you are about to look for the fifth. And you are already thinking: that first guy (who showed results at the end of the 2000s) was smart after all. You were lucky with him, it turns out, very lucky, oh, he got lazy for some reason. You need to look for someone just as smart, but not lazy.