Keep up with the story. Subscribe to the Social Media Today free daily newsletter

[shaownhasan]

This latest revelation will underline this further, showing that Zuckerberg is potentially willing to undercut artists for his own business gain.

Which, I guess, is not a major revelation in the end. ecuador b2b leads CEOs are responsible for business performance, and are beholden to their shareholders, so it’s not a huge surprise that they would act in the company’s interests. But there has also been a bigger push to support more ethical businesses in recent times, and revelations like this, if they’re proven correct, could have an impact.

But then again, the media cycle is much shorter than it used to be, and controversies tend to only hold for a day or so, till the next issue of the day takes over. So maybe, it’s not as big of a risk as it seems, and maybe Meta sees the eventual development of more advanced AI as more valuable than the risks of accessing a single dataset.

After all, Meta has previously argued that using any publicly available materials to train its AI tools is covered under “fair use”, a copyright clause that allows for such use in specific cases, like news reporting.

That seems like a fairly egregious misreading of that clause, but again, Meta’s legal team has been fairly audacious in its attempts to justify the company’s use of massive datasets.